shittywebcomics:

(Different mod, same bullshit)

Oh my god can we finally kill this false equivalence once and for all? Yes dangling scrotums is the exact same thing as exposed cleavage you’ve cracked the code. Now show up to work tomorrow with half your dong hanging out and watch all the praise you’ll get from the ladies for finally smashing oppressive gender barriers oops they’ve called the police on you.

This kind of point is only ever made by guys who project their own sexual criteria on women, or by women who never get out of the house. Honestly, if you threw a skirt onto most super heroine costumes, they wouldn’t be that far off from a lot of women’s formal dresses, worn in public, in a place we call reality. This concept is lost on fugly cat ladies who can’t comprehend being an attractive woman in a revealing outfit, and have never had a man around long enough to tell them that bouncing ballsacks don’t hurt.

Then this stupid comic can’t even follow its own logic. They have a hero parade his dick around, then say OH BUT DRESSING SEXY MEANS YOU MUST BE EVIL and show a villain. So which is it? It’s contradicting itself just so it can attack every possible imaginary PATRIARCHY evil. Ha ha yes, all those men running around using sex to get anything they want, chicks buying them lots of things hoping to get at all that sex.

According to Escher Girls, this was “written by Martha Thomases and Valerie (D’Orazio) Gallagher, and drawn by Norm Breyfogle.”’

i.e. A man did all the work. Two broads came up with an idea of how men are evil and oppress women then actually had to go running to a man to enable them. He was probably forced at gunpoint to draw them into the comic 500% thinner than they are in real life, something the Penny Arcade wives do every week.

At least now I have a little more respect for the Girls with Slingshots lady who actually draws her own stuff.